Showing posts with label M16. Show all posts
Showing posts with label M16. Show all posts
Thursday, 21 February 2013
Adcor Industries Gets it Right
About 2 years ago I wrote an article about the AR15 and advancements that need to be made to bring the rifle up to modern fighting rifle techniques. When I started this blog it was one of the first articles I bridged over from Facebook to here.
Well great minds must think alike. The Brown Enhanced Automatic Rifle has taken the AR15 platform to the 21st century with a ambidextrous cocking handle located on the upper area of the handguards. Finally riflemen will not have to move their support hands back to manipulate the cocking handle or worse yet take their dominant hand off the pistol grip to manipulate the handle.
The old throwback to bolt action rifles is finally gone. I hope other manufacturers follow suit.
http://www.adcorindustries.com/wordpress/index.php/products/bear/
Saturday, 28 July 2012
223/556 and the AR15 Barrel
In the world of the AR15, shorter is cooler. This runs contrary to everything else in
life. Guys want giant trucks, giant
houses, giant dogs, big big big! Even in
firearm calibers there are those that would rather have giant calibers such as
458 SOCOM or 50 Beowulf. Yet when it
comes to the AR15 it seems that the opposite holds true or should I say, the
opposite holds false - The AR15 is
something where size actually does matter either in a bigger caliber or a
longer barrel.
The original M16/AR15 had a 20 inch barrel. With the 55grain rounds of the time they would
achieve a muzzle velocity of 3259 feet per second. It was determined at the rifle’s conception
that a velocity no less than 3000 feet per second would be needed to achieve fragmentation
and thus maximum lethality in the 55grain M193 round.
During the Vietnam conflict Special Operation Groups or SOG
Teams would conduct clandestine operations in Vietnam ranging from black
propaganda to direct action. A shorter,
handier rifle was developed to lighten the load and compensate for SOG’s long
term reconnaissance patrols and for rear echelon troops not needing a full
rifle. The new M4 Carbine had a barrel
length of roughly 14.5” giving a muzzle velocity just a touch over the needed
3000 ft/s. This meant that the M4 could
rarely have the needed velocity past 100 meter mark to achieve the lethality
that the round was developed for. With
this limitation a new round was developed.
The slower moving but longer 62 grain round designated the SS109 was a
fair way to fix some of the fragmentation problems. It may seem counter intuitive, but the longer
SS109 (although slower) would fragment easier as it was a longer bullet. Think of it as trying to break a short stick
and trying to break a longer stick – the longer acts as a better lever and
snaps easier.
So the M4 was…. Well….. better now that it had a new round
but after the battle of Mogadishu, Delta reported that their M4 carbines had
little effect on the Somalis. They often
switched to their heavy hitting 1911s to bring the insurgents down. It was forgotten that simply having a longer
barrel on the M4 would of given them back the lethality that their rifles
needed.
USSOCOM found that the higher unlock pressures generated by
the shorter M4 gas system, caused premature wear on the rifle causing parts
needing to be replaced or repaired at a rate 4 times faster then that of the
M16. For a government agency it is not a
big issue… for an individual on a budget, this seems like a big deal.
But for reasons I simply can’t understand the mentality of
“smaller is cooler” concept took the AR15 platform in a ridiculous direction;
10” and 7.5” AR15 barrel lengths.
Essentially if you were to stick the barrel of such an AR against
someone’s flesh, you MIGHT get lethal bullet velocity but I would argue the
blast is more effective at that point in dealing damage. 10” AR15s simply turn bullets into
noise. There is no advantage at that
point other than LCF – Look Cool Factor.
If you really need something that short, switch to a SMG or a pistol
caliber carbine.
The main people I deal with are not military and don’t have
milspec M193 or SS109 and are using the similar (but not identical) .223
Remmington round. I can only conclude
that the minimum length for the lower pressure and lower velocity 55gr .223
Remington, a barrel length should be no less than 18 inches to get the needed
effect out of the round. Should a user
opt for a heavier 62gr bullet, you could go as short as 16”. But always remember – bigger is better.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)