I am going to delve a little bit into the realm of American law. I recently read about a case “Bond V The United States” where a woman attempted to poison her husband. I will not get into the fine details here as Google is (kind of) your friend.
Although in Canada this would be a clear case of attempted murder, they chose to try her as being in violation of the Chemical Weapons Treaty. Essentially they substituted federal/state law for international law. This is still before the courts but it spells ominous things for the people of the United States. If Bond is found guilty of violating the Chemical Weapons Treaty then it sets a legal precedent for other International laws and treaties to supersede the laws of the United States. The question is, does the 10th amendment limit her legal charges to the American version of attempted murder or does the 10th amendment not hold and thus the CWT violation and other laws formed from international treaty can be pursued.
If she loses her case, any treaty can be signed and used to bypass the US Constitution and any protections it may offer. This is key.
The cowardly John Kerry recently signed a treaty regulating the sale and transfer of arms. (I think you know where I am going with this). If Bond loses, Obama will finally have the backdoor that he needs to finally eliminate pesky things that prevent the expansion of government powers. Based on his past exploits with “Fast and the Furious” and his campaign promises we must assume that the Second Amendment is first on his list to destroy.
He has already hinted that measures were being taken to curb gun rights in America. Fast and the Furious was a failed attempt to generate gun violence in Mexico to make the public more sympathetic to gun control schemes and bans. It begs the question; what other black psychological operations has he been involved with that he was NOT caught on? He has shown with his reckless disregard for human life; the serfs are expendable if it advances his blind ideology.
First they will establish a gun registry. The Arms Trade Treaty requires it. Every country that eliminated gun ownership needed to take this step over a long period; usually 10 to 20 years to get the bulk of the new gun owners trapped in the system. The Canadian example shows that you do not need even 50% compliance because they are not worried about the 40 and 50 year olds who owned before the registry and refuse to register now, they want the shooters of tomorrow.
The next step is to use that registry to ban classes of guns. In Canada, people are generally terrified of pistols and view rifles as part of everyday life, hence most pistols are illegal and rifles are largely uncontrolled. Americans seem to be terrified of rifles but view pistols as a necessity to self protection. I suspect the American government will first go after rifles much like Canada went after pistols. A precedent was already set with Bill “The Pimp” Clinton’s Assault Weapons Ban in the 90’s only this time, there will be no sunset clause and with a registry, those guns deemed illegal will be seized.
I always hear Americans saying things like “From my cold dead hands” but the truth is, they will hand over their guns when faced with the destructive forces of done strikes, mechanized infantry and active denial systems.
And this is not just about guns. Treaty’s signed will allow the government to easily suppress freedom of speech, seize your children, increase your taxes and limit your travel.
So the path to Obama’s socialist “utopia” filled with abject despair, poverty and suffering is being decided right now in the Supreme Court. It hinges on Bond v The United States. Either the supremacy of the US Constitution will be upheld or it will be trampled down.
